Psychological Features of Violation of Restrictions on Receiving Gifts
Abstract
Violation of restrictions on the receipt of gifts in domestic law is considered as an administrative offense related to corruption, not directly, but indirectly belongs to corruption. Violation of restrictions on the receipt of gifts entails disciplinary, administrative and civil liability. The purpose of the article is to investigate the peculiarities of the subjective side of the offense, provided for in Article 172-5 of the Code of Administrative Offenses. Methodology. The general scientific methods of formal logic (deduction, induction, analogy, analysis, synthesis, abstraction and modeling) are used, with the help of which administrative sanctions for violation of restrictions on receiving gifts are disclosed. Scientific novelty. The violation of the restrictions on the receipt of gifts is committed by the person solely intentionally, that is, the person is aware of the unlawful nature of his act or omission, anticipates its harmful effects and desires them or knowingly permits them to occur. Сonclusions. The results of the study show that the establishment of a balanced system of restrictions on the receipt of gifts in the national legislation is in line with international experience and helps to build a proper mechanism for preventing corruption. In the consideration of cases of the specified category by the courts, special attention is paid to: establishment of psychological aspects of these types of offenses, in particular the internal attitude of a person to violation of restrictions on receiving gifts, awareness of the social harm of the offender; to find out if the person was aware of the value of the gift and whether they were taking steps to determine that value. The problems of establishing violation of restrictions on receiving gifts in the activity of persons authorized to perform the functions of the state and local self-government, equal to them, are covered. The legal framework regulating the subject of the research is analyzed, as well as the jurisprudence that has emerged in the law enforcement process, resulting in the gaps in the legislation in this field.
Keywords: violation of restrictions; gift; legal regulation; hospitality; corruption.
Downloads
References
Abraham J., Suleeman J., Takwin B. Psychological mechanism of corruption: A comprehensive review. Asian Journal
of Scientific Research. 2018. No. 11 (4). Р. 587–604. doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajsr.2018.587.604.
Barsky A. Investigating the Effects of Moral Disengagement and Participation on Unethical Work Behavior. Journal
of Business Ethics. 2011. No. 104 (1). Р. 59–75. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0889-7.
Кримінальне право України. Загальна частина : підручник / [М. І. Бажанов, Ю. В. Баулін, В. І. Борисов та ін.] ;
за ред. М. І. Бажанова, В. В. Сташиса, В. Я. Тація. Київ : Юрінком Інтер ; Харків : Право, 2001. 416 с.
Gottschalk P. Theory of Convenience: Determinants of White-Collar Crime Intention. Deviant Behavior. 2019. Р. 1–9. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2019.1624101.
Казміренко Л. І., Кудерміна О. І. Теоретико-методологічні підходи до дослідження корупції як психологічного феномену. Юридична психологія. 2018. № 2 (23). С. 9–19. URL: https://psychped.naiau.kiev.ua /index.php/psychped/article/view/885/976.
Контрольний список питань для оцінки дотримання верховенства права, схвалений Комітетом Міністрів Ради Європи та Конгресом місцевих і регіональних властей Ради Європи 11–12 берез. 2016 р. URL: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2016)007-rus.
Судовий розгляд справ про правопорушення, пов’язані з корупцією : практ. посіб. / кол. авт. ; за ред. О. М. Костенка. Київ : Нац. акад. прокуратури України, 2018. 346 с.
Кудрявцев В. Н. Объективная сторона преступления : монография. М. : Госюриздат, 1960. 244 с.
Ленська Л. В. Психолого-правова характеристика грабежу : дис. … канд. юрид. наук : 19.00.06. Київ, 2019. URL: http://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/14102/1/avtoreferat_lenska_lv.pdf.
Постанова Дніпропетровського районного суду Дніпропетровської області від 29 січ. 2019 р. Справа № 175/228/19. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/79491860.
Постанова Галицького районного суду м. Львова від 30 жовт. 2019 р. Справа № 461/6031/19. URL: http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85339939.
Рубинштейн С. Л. Основы общей психологи. СПб. : Питер, 2002. 720 с.
Цивільний кодекс України : Закон України від 16 січ. 2003 р. № 435-IV. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua /laws/show/435-15/stru#Stru.
Вознюк А. А. Психологічні теорії пояснення корупції. Юридична психологія. 2019. № 2 (25). С. 7–15. URL: https://psychped.naiau.kiev.ua/index.php/psychped/article/view/1115/1120. doi: https://doi.org/10.33270/03192502.
Про державний бюджет на 2020 рік : Закон України від 14 листоп. 2019 р. № 294-ІХ. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/294-20.
Про запобігання корупції : Закон України від 14 жовт. 2014 р. № 1700-VII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/1700-18/print.
Zaloznaya M. The social psychology of corruption: Why it does not exist and why it should. Sociology Compass. 2014. No. 8 (2). P. 187–202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12120.
Звіт за результатами Четвертого раунду оцінювання стану виконання Україною рекомендацій GRECO, ухвалений на 76-му пленарному засіданні GRECO (Страсбург, 19–23 черв. 2017 р.). URL: https://rm.coe.int/grecoeval 4rep-2016-9-p3-76-greco-19-23-2017-/1680737206.
Abstract views: 205 PDF Downloads: 234
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their own work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute published work with mandatory reference to authors of the original work and the first publication of an article in this magazine.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements on non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published in the journal (for example, to post an article in the institution's repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
- The journal's policy allows and encourages the posting of articles by authors on the Internet (for example, in electronic storehouses of institutions or on personal websites), both before the submission of this manuscript to the editorial office and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the creation of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work.
