Application of Penal Psychiatry to Persons Serving a Sentence: Historical and Legal Analysis

  • Tetiana DEMIANCHUK

    PhD in History, Associate Professor, Doctoral Student of the Department of Theory
    of State and Law the National Academy of Internal Affairs

    Kyіv, Ukraine

    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8908-4356

Abstract

Abstract. The relevance of the article is determined by the need to analyze the prerequisites for the use of penal psychiatry in the Soviet period, to highlight the main stages of the evolution of this system, the ways and forms of violation of the rights of persons who served punishment, as well as a comparison with similar processes in foreign countries. It is also important to follow how psychiatry is used in the re-education of criminals, how people in need of psychological help are treated. The article uses a set of principles and methods of scientific knowledge, in particular the principles of objectivity and historicism, as well as the methods of analysis and synthesis, generalization, legal, formal-legal, systemic-historical, retrospective analysis, dialectical, phenomenological, hermeneutic and systemic. A characterization of the historical and legal conditions of the formation of penal psychiatry as a component of the Soviet criminal-executive system has been carried out. An assessment of the practice of specialized psychiatric institutions in relation to persons who have served a sentence is presented. It was established that the first facts of the use of punitive psychiatry took place in the 1920s and were directed primarily against political opponents of the Bolsheviks. It is specified that the organizational design of penal psychiatry, as a tool of the criminal-executive system, took place in the 1930s and was determined primarily by the growth of repression. Regarding the normative and legal design of such a method of punishment as punitive psychiatry, the first laws were issued in 1948 and 1954 pp. The full legalization of the application of medical measures to criminals took place after the adoption of the new Criminal Code in 1961. The Soviet legislation of the 1960s and 1970s eliminated the extrajudicial procedure for referral to forced treatment and at the same time did not establish the terms of forced treatment. It has been established that for the Soviet authorities, punitive psychiatry as a method of punishment was almost the most effective way of combating dissent in the conditions of the activation of public opinion, because without public publicity it was possible to isolate any person and even deprive him of his life. The analysis of foreign practice shows that research into the mental state of victims, witnesses, and representatives of law enforcement agencies is an urgent need in the conditions of reforming the penitentiary system today. It is important to focus attention on the training of highly qualified specialists in the field of psychiatry who are ready to work both with accused persons and with persons serving sentences. It has been established that the conditions of stay of persons with mental disorders in correctional institutions are a problematic issue

 

Keywords: penal psychiatry; human rights; correctional system; psychiatry; penitentiary system

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tetiana DEMIANCHUK

PhD in History, Associate Professor, Doctoral Student of the Department of Theory
of State and Law the National Academy of Internal Affairs

Kyіv, Ukraine

References

Андрушко А. В. Каральна психіатрія та проблеми кримінально-правової протидії її використанню в Радянському Союзі. Сила права і право сили: історичний вимір та сучасне бачення проблеми : матеріали ХХХІІ Міжнар. істор.-прав. конф. (Полтава, 28–31 трав. 2015 р.). Київ–Полтава : ПУЕТ, 2015. С. 327–331. URL: https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/4015

Arratibel N. Was the USSR a totalitarian state? 2020. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/340461688_Was_the_USSR_a_totalitarian_state

Baranyi G., Scholl C., Fazel S., Patel V., Priebe S., Mundt A. P. Severe mental illness and substance use disorders in prisoners in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies. Lancet Glob Health. 2019. No. 7 (4). Р. 461–471. URL: https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/langlo/PIIS2214-109X(18)30539-4.pdf

Bloch S. Psychiatry as ideology in the USSR. Journal of medical ethics. 1978. Т. 4. No. 3. Р. 126–131. URL: https://philpapers.org/rec/BLOPAI-2

Блох С., Реддауэй П. Диагноз: инакомыслие. Как советские психиатры лечат от политического инакомыслия / пер. с англ. ; предисл. В. Буковского. London : Overseas Publications Interchange Ltd, 1981. 420 с.

Brown J. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Crime: Historical and Current Aspects. Oxford Bibliographies. 2018. doi: 10.1093/OBO/9780195396607-0170

Crawford M. History of Forensic Psychology : book. 2014. doi: 10.13140/2.1.5147.9849

Crittenden P. M., Landini A., Spieker S. J. Staying alive: A 21st century agenda for mental health, child protection and forensic services. Human Systems. 2021. No. 1 (1). Р. 29–51. doi: 10.1177/26344041211007831

Frierson R. L. Taking our heads out of the sand: manpower needs in correctional psychiatry. Newsl Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2019. No. 44 (2). Р. 4–25.

Gómez-Figueroa H., Camino-Proaño A. Mental and behavioral disorders in the prison context. Rev Esp Sanid Penit. 2022. No. 24 (2). Р. 66–74. doi: 10.18176/resp.00052

Haesen S., Merkt H., Imber A., Elger B., Wangmo T. Substance use and other mental health disorders among older prisoners. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019. No. 62. Р. 20–31.

Hart D. Health risks of practicing correctional medicine. AMA J Ethics. 2019. No. 21 (6). Р. 540–545. URL: https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/health-risks-practicing-correctional-medicine/2019-06

History of Forensic Psychology. 2019. URL: https://www.scribd.com/document/440143061/HISTORY-OF-FORENSIC-PSYCHOLOGY

Hopkin G., Evans-Lacko S., Forrester A., Shaw J., Thornicroft G. Interventions at the Transition from Prison to the Community for Prisoners with Mental Illness: A Systematic Review. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018. No. 45 (4). Р. 623–634.

Kmieciak B. Selected Problems of Forensic Psychiatry: Polish Perspective. Scholars. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice. 2019. No. 2 (8). P. 256–259. URL: https://saudijournals.com/media/articles/SIJLCJ_28_256-259_c.pdf

Knapp, M. (2007). Mental health policy and practice across Europe: the future direction of mental health care. New York, 2007. URL: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/ 0007/96451/E89814.pdf.

Kujawski R. Differential diagnosis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in the early 20th century. Are we wiser after a hundred years? Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. 2017. No. 1. Р. 42–58.

Marzooqi S., Shehhi A. Forensic-Correctional Psychiatric Services in Abu Dhabi: Lessons From a Descriptive Analyis of the Attributes of a Sample of Service Users. Psychiatria danubina. 2022. No. 34. P. 635–643. doi: 10.24869/psyd.2022.635

Maschi T., Dasarathy D. Aging With Mental Disorders in the Criminal Justice System: A Content Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2019. No. 63 (12).

Р. 2103–2137.

Morris N. P., West S. G. Misconceptions About Working in Correctional Psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry Law. 2020. No. 48 (2). doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003921-20

Подрабинек А. Карательная медицина. Нью Йорк : Хроника, 1979. 193 с.

Радж В. Психиатрический диагноз как этическая проблема. Этика психиатрии. Киев : Сфера, 1998. С. 84–106.

Росси Ж. Справочник по ГУЛагу: исторический словарь советских пенитенциарных институций и терминов, связанных с принудительным трудом / предисл. А. Безансона. Overseas Publications Interchange Ltd London, 1987 URL: https://vtoraya-literatura.com/pdf/rossi_spravochnik_ po_gulagu_1987_text.pdf

Широкова І. В. Каральна психіатрія у СРСР: наука на службі у держави (1960–1980). Наукові записки НаУКМА. 2012. T. 130. C. 33–36. URL: http://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/bitstream/ handle/123456789/1804/Shyrokova_Karalna_psykhiatriia.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Stein D. J., Shoptaw S. J., Vigo D. V., Lund C., Cuijpers P., Bantjes J., Sartorius N., Maj M. Psychiatric diagnosis and treatment in the 21st century: paradigm shifts versus incremental integration. World Psychiatry. 2022. No. 21 (3). Р. 393–414. doi: 10.1002/wps.20998

Thomson A., Eales S., McAllister E., Molodynski A. Criminal sanctions for suicidality in the 21st Century UK. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2022. No. 221 (5). P. 653–654. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2022.53

Твердохлебов А. Заявление начальнику Днепропетровской психиатрической больницы специального типа. Альманах самиздата. Неподцензурная мысль в СССР. 1975. № 2. С. 36–41.

Van Buitenen N., Van den Berg C. J. W., Meijers J., Harte J. M. The prevalence of mental disorders and patterns of comorbidity within a large sample of mentally ill prisoners: A network analysis. Eur Psychiatry. 2020. No. 63 (1). Р. 63. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.63

Використання психіатрії в політичних цілях в СРСР. URL: http://surl.li/fkemu


Abstract views: 85
PDF Downloads: 108
Published
2023-09-05
Section
Articles