Analysis of the Psychological Aspects of the Constructive Activities of Forensic Service Employees
Abstract
Abstract. This work is dedicated to analyzing the psychological aspects of the constructive activities of forensic service employees, with a focus on key elements that define the effectiveness and quality of their professional work. The relevance of the article is driven by the need to scrutinize the aspects of constructive activities of a forensic expert. In the contemporary judicial context, where justice and objectivity of decisions play a critical role, understanding the psychological peculiarities of forensic experts becomes exceedingly important. The purpose of this research is a thorough analysis of psychological factors influencing the ability of forensic experts for objective assessment of materials provided for research and making scientifically grounded decisions within the framework of forensic expertise. The paper thoroughly examines the psychological processes that arise during forensic expertise and affect the quality of forensic conclusions. The results of the theoretical analysis provide a profound understanding of the psychological processes influencing the work of expert services. The research is based on the theoretical analysis of psychological aspects of judicial work, including the consideration of psychological processes affecting the objectivity and constructiveness of forensic experts. Theoretical methods of analysis and synthesis are employed. The results of the theoretical analysis reveal important aspects of the psychological characteristics of forensic experts, their impact on constructive activities, and ways to improve the quality of conclusions. The scientific novelty of this research lies in the analysis of internal psychological processes of forensic experts aimed at achieving objectivity and constructiveness in their work. The study traces important moments affecting the decision-making by experts and can enhance the professional activities of forensic experts. The practical significance lies in the possibility of using the acquired knowledge to increase the level of psychological readiness of forensic service employees for the challenges of their professional activities. The results of this research can serve as a basis for further empirical studies and the development of practical programs to enhance the professional efficiency of experts in the context of their psychological training.
Keywords: forensic activity; forensic expert; forensic expertise; psychological aspects of constructive activities; professional competence of the expert; responsibility.
Downloads
References
Abdumalik, Z.A. (2021). Information Support for Forensic Expert Activities of Forensic Institutions: Current Problems of Theory and Practice. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 03(01), 98-102. doi: 10.37547/tajpslc/Volume03Issue01-16.
Alexeeva, A. (2020). Social Communicative Competence as a Factor Influencing an Individual's Professional Successfulness: in the Context of the Psychological Sex. Psychological Prospects Journal, 35, 8-23. doi: 10.29038/2227-1376-2020-35-8-23.
Avramchenko, S. (2021). Professional Consciousness as a Subjective Component of Personal Professional Development. Journal of Intellectual Disability – Diagnosis and Treatment, 9, 536-545. doi: 10.6000/2292-2598.2021.09.05.12.
Babii, M.M. (2020). Concept and Levels of Competence and Competency of a Judicial Expert. Technologies, Tools, and Strategies for Implementing Scientific Research: Materials of the International Scientific Conference (pp. 163-165). Kherson: MTsND.
Bondarenko, N., & Skalenko, P. (2022). Professionalism of law enforcement agencies specialists': theoretical analysis of the problem. Psychological prospects journal, 39, 10-24. doi: 10.29038/2227-1376-2022-39-bon.
Dzholos, O. (2019). Competence and Identification of Experts in the Context of Adherence to Standards of Information Balance and Credibility. Scientific Notes of the Institute of Journalism, 1(74), 38-45. doi: 10.17721/2522-1272.2019.74.4.
Khazratova, N., Malimon, L., Terentiev, O., & Oliinyk, A. (2022). Readiness to Conflicts Resolving as a Factor in the Mental Health of a Lawyer in His Professional Activity. Psychological Prospects Journal, 39, 367-381. doi: 10.29038/2227-1376-2022-39-haz.
Koodrin, J. (2020). Error vs. Accuracy Rates: Evaluating Forensic Expert Credibility (Doctoral thesis, University of Adelaide,. Australia). Retrieved from https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/ dspace/bitstream/2440/131211/1/KoodrinJ_2020_Hons.pdf.
Kovalov, V.V. (2021). Modern Electronic Services as a Means of Communication of Expert Institutions with Customers of Expert Services. Criminalistic Bulletin, 34(2), 57-65. doi: 10.37025/1992-4437/2020-34-2-57.
Kurdes, O.V. (2021). Features of the Psychological Training of Judicial Experts as a Component of the Adaptation Process. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 23, 110-122. doi: 10.32353/khrife.1.2021.08.
Kurdes, O.V. (2023). Transformation of the Personality of a Judicial Expert in Extreme Conditions of Wartime. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 1(30), 144-161. doi: 10.32353/khrife.1.2023.08.
Mozharovska, T. (2021). Psychological Well-being: Theoretical Approaches to the Concept Definition. Psychological Prospects Journal, 37, 155-167. doi: 10.29038/2227-1376-2021-37-155-167.
Nedashkivska, O.A., & Nedashkivska, T.Ye. (2022). Experiment as a Means of Studying the Cognition of a Judicial Expert Regarding Expert Initiative. Criminalistic Bulletin, 37(1), 79-89. doi: 10.37025/1992-4437/2022-37-1-79.
Pastryk, T. (2022). Expressed Emotion in the Context of Personality Traits Model: Theoretical and Empirical Examining the Key Concepts. Psychological Prospects Journal, 40, 136-148. doi: 10.29038/2227-1376-2022-40-pas.
Pavlović, J. (2021). Team Coaching Psychology: Toward an Integration of Constructivist Approaches. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 34(4), 450-462. doi: 10.1080/10720537.2019.1700856.
Petrova, I.A., & Dontsova, O.S. (2020). Features of the Formation of Professional Competencies of a Forensic Merchandising Expert. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 21,
-178. doi: 10.32353/khrife.1.2020_11.
Pievtsov, H.V., Usachov, O.A., Patsek, P., & Romaniuk, A.O. (2020). Combined Methodology for Assessing the Competence of Experts in Choosing a Scenario for Organizing Information-Psychological Influence. Science and Technology of Air Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, 2(39), 24-36. doi: 10.30748/nitps.2020.39.03.
Poltorak, A. (2023). Positive Psychology as an Instrument of Personnel Motivation in Enterprises. Modern economics, 38(1), 132-138. doi: 10.31521/modecon.v38(2023)-20.
Samoilova, O., & Pecherska, I. (2022). Expert Prevention as one of the Forms of Forensic Expert Activity and the Role of a Judicial Expert in this Field. Young Scientist, 2(102), 58-62. doi: 10.32839/2304-5809/2022-2-102-12.
Sivchuk, I. (2021). Professional Competence of a Judicial Expert. Scientific Practice: Modern and Classical Research Methods, 1, 115-116. doi: 10.36074/logos-26.02.2021.v1.34.
Vilinskyi, M.S. (2022). Expert as a Participant in the Judicial Process. Development of Civil Society as a Necessary Component of European Integration of Ukraine: All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 27-31). Kyiv. doi: 10.36059/978-966-397-271-8-18.
Virna, Zh. (2023). Constructive Psychology as a Technology for Transforming the Human Mind. Psychological Prospects Journal, 41, 41-54. doi: 10.29038/2227-1376-2023-41-vir.
Abstract views: 34 PDF Downloads: 106
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their own work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute published work with mandatory reference to authors of the original work and the first publication of an article in this magazine.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements on non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published in the journal (for example, to post an article in the institution's repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
- The journal's policy allows and encourages the posting of articles by authors on the Internet (for example, in electronic storehouses of institutions or on personal websites), both before the submission of this manuscript to the editorial office and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the creation of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work.
