Psychological Aspects of the Criteria for Admissibility of Tactical Techniques
Abstract
Abstract. The purpose of the article is to highlight the criteria for admissibility of tactical techniques during the implementation of investigative (search) actions. Methodology. The methodological toolkit was chosen in accordance with the outlined goal, the specifics of the object and the subject of research. To solve the tasks and achieve the goal, a set of methods and techniques of scientific knowledge were applied, which allowed to comprehensively investigate the object of research. Methods of formal logic (analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, analogy, abstraction) made it possible to understand the content of the issues in more detail. Special legal methods were used in the research: comparative legal - during the analysis of norms of national legislation, scientific categories, definitions and approaches; the method of system analysis - for a comprehensive generalization of the criteria for the admissibility of tactical techniques. The scientific novelty consists in distinguishing the criteria for the admissibility of a tactical approach from the point of view of the application of psychological influence. Conclusions. The question of the admissibility of a tactical technique during the implementation of investigative (search) actions is a question of law, while the circumstances that may lead to the inadmissibility of evidence due to a violation of the criteria for the admissibility of tactical techniques are questions of fact. Psychological influence, acting as a component of a tactical reception and being a permanent source of formation of tactical recommendations, should be built within the framework of procedural requirements for carrying out a certain procedural action.
Keywords: criminal proceedings; forensic tactics; criminalistics; tactical reception; psychological influence; admissibility of evidence; tactical techniques.
Downloads
References
Alenin, Yu.P. (2013). Ways of improving the beginning of a pre-trial investigation. Scientific works of the National University "Odesa Law Academy", 13, 175-184. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/ UJRN/Nponyua_2013_13_19.
Antonov, K.V., Sachko, O.V., Tertyshnyk, V.M., & Uvarov, V.H. (2015). Theory of proofs. V.M. Tertyshnyk (Eds.). Kyiv: Alerta.
Blackaby, N., Partasides, C., Redfern, A., & Hunter, M. (Eds.). (2009). Redfern & Hunter on International Arbitration (Fifth edition). Oxford University Press.
Bocharov, D.O. (2007). Evidence in law enforcement activity: general theoretical issues (Doctoral thesis, Kharkiv, Ukraine).
Byshevets, O.V. (2014). Tactical techniques based on methods of psychological influence in criminal proceedings: concepts and types. Bulletin of the Chernivtsi Faculty of the National University "Odesa Law Academy", 1, 125-135. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vchfo_2014_1_14.
Chornous, Y., Reznik, N., Samodin, A., & Nikitina-Dudikova, H. (2020). Techniques of procedural actions performance in green room environment: comparative analysis of European and Ukrainian practices. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol., 29(6), 1109-1115. Retrieved from URL: https://www.scopus.com/ record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85083431234&origin=inward&txGid=c0b831425d5dc3df337baf9d4bf5199e.
Chornous, Yu.M. (2020). Psychological foundations of the implementation of tactical techniques. Legal psychology, 1(26), 13-22. doi: 10.33270/03202601.13.
Husieva, V., Lukash, S., Krykun, V., Morhunov, O., & Shapoval, K. (2021). Conditions conducive to the domestic violence against the elderly based on the judicial and investigative practice of Ukraine. Amazonia Investiga, 10(46), 118-127. doi: 10.34069/AI/2021.46.10.11.
Kuzmichov, V.S., & Chornous, Yu.M. (2005). Investigative activity: characteristics and areas of improvement. Kyiv: Nichlava.
Lyseiuk, A.M., Muliavka, D.H., & Honcharova, A.O. (2019). Evidence at the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings regarding crimes in the sphere of illegal circulation of excise goods: problems of theory and practice. Kyiv. Retrieved from http://ir.nusta.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/doc/3801/1/4007_IR.pdf.
Maliarova, V.O. (2016). Adequacy and admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University, 29, 2(3), 119-122. Retrieved from https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/lib/12323/1.pdf.
Moskalenko, O.V. (2017). Tactical method in the system of forensic tactics: criteria for its admissibility. Collection of scientific works of Kharkiv National Pedagogical University named after H.S. Skovoroda, 26, 102-110. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.884298.
Nikitina-Dudikova, H.Yu. (2022). Forensic methods of investigation of criminal offenses against sexual freedom and sexual integrity of children. Vinnytsia: Tvory.
Nikolaienko, S., Nikolaienko, Sv. (2011). Category of psychological influence in psychology. Worldview - Philosophy - Religion, 1(1), 76-85. Retrieved from http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/ handle/123456789/39499/09-Nikolaienko2.pdf?sequence=1.
Nor, V.T. (et al.) (Eds.). (2020). Great Ukrainian legal encyclopedia (Vol. 19). Kharkiv: Pravo.
Pereverza, O.Ya. (2000). Formation of false testimony, system of tactical methods of their detection and overcoming (Doctoral thesis, Kharkiv, Ukraine).
Pilkov, K. (2020). Properties of evidence and criteria for their evaluation. Commercial law and process, 4, 86-99. doi: 10.32849/2663-5313/2020.4.14.
Prylutskyi, S. (2006). Admissibility of evidence: modernity and prospects of the criminal process of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine, 4, 85-89.
Ruda, T.V. (2008). The concept and content of the institution of proof in the civil procedural law of the USA and Ukraine: a comparative aspect. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, 79, 47-50.
Schlaepfer, A.V., & Bärtsch, P. (2010). A Few Reflections on the Assessment of Evidence by International Arbitrators. International Business Law Journal. Revue de Droit des Affaires Internationales, 3, 211-223.
Serhieieva, D.B. (2015). Admissibility of evidence in theory and CPC 2012. Herald of criminal justice, 3, 80-87. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vkc_2015_3_11.
Sokyran, F.M. (2020). Application of psychological influence in criminal justice. Forensic Herald, 32(2), 15-21. doi: 10.37025/1992-4437/2019-32-2-15.
Terekhovych, V., & Nymande, E. (2018). The essence of criminalistic tactics. Theory and practice of forensic examination and criminology, 18, 35-44. doi: 10.32353/khrife.2018.04.
Tsymbal, P., Vlasova, G., Nikitina-Dudikova, H., Kharchenko, N., & Soroka, I. (2021). International cooperation in the investigation of sexual crimes against children. Amazonia Investiga, 10(40), 132-141. doi: 10.34069/AI/2021.40.04.14.
Urakov, D.R. (2023). Prevention of Crimes Against the Sexual Inviolability of Minors Through the use of the Internet. World Bulletin of Management and Law, 18, 61-64. Retrieved from https://www.scholarexpress.net/index.php/wbml/article/view/1951.
Vapniarchuk, V.V. (2015). General characteristics of the properties of evidence and their distinction between themselves. State and law, 68, 361-375. Retrieved from https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/ bitstream/123456789/13433/1/Vapnyarchuk_361-375.pdf.
Veselskyi, V.K. (2014). To the issue of admissibility of tactical techniques. Forensics and forensic examination, 59, 135-140. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/krise_2014_59_18.
Abstract views: 25 PDF Downloads: 58
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their own work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute published work with mandatory reference to authors of the original work and the first publication of an article in this magazine.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements on non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published in the journal (for example, to post an article in the institution's repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
- The journal's policy allows and encourages the posting of articles by authors on the Internet (for example, in electronic storehouses of institutions or on personal websites), both before the submission of this manuscript to the editorial office and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the creation of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work.
