Conflict of Discoursive and Stereotyped Decisions in the Mechanism of Counterproductive Behavior
Keywords:
discursive decisions, intuitive decisions, stereotyped (habitual) solutions, counterproductive behavior, recurrent criminality, recurrent victimity
Abstract
The article analyzes the mechanism of making decision by an individual. It is argued that the decision-making process of an individual continues from the moment when information is received about a specific situation and until the implementation of a certain variant of the action. In accordance with the mechanism of choosing the option of action, decisions can be classifiedas discursive (make das a result of conscious and reasoned choice), intuitive (makedinan unconventional situations a result unconscious but creative choice) and habitual (maked on the basis of the existing stereotypes algorithm factions). The pattern of a stereotyped (habitual) solution is developed in the process of a repeated «experience» of the standard situation, based on the individual’s own life experience, and on the assimilation of certain social stereotypes. In the mechanism of counter productive (including recurrent delictual and recurrent victim) behavior, the conflict between conscious (discursive) and unconscious (habitual) decisions plays an essential role. The social (national, religious, etc.) stereotypes that assimilated in the early age are usually not rationally interpreted, and exist in the world view structure as the «only true/most appropriate» model of the world-perception and self-perception. There fore, the customary decisions made on their basis of ten have an advantage over discursive ones, even in cases when they don’t meet the conditions of time and action. The causes of the formation of counter productive stereotypes of habitual solutions in each specific case can be psychological trauma, pathological fixation on certain complexes, in adequate self-esteem, and excessive dependence (or «anti dependence») on the social demands of some social community or specific individual. Over coming counter productive stereotypes of habitual decisions requires active support from significant others and development of correct socials kills.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Abstract views: 229 PDF Downloads: 134
Issue
Section
Theoretical and methodological issues of legal psychology
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their own work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute published work with mandatory reference to authors of the original work and the first publication of an article in this magazine.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements on non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published in the journal (for example, to post an article in the institution's repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
- The journal's policy allows and encourages the posting of articles by authors on the Internet (for example, in electronic storehouses of institutions or on personal websites), both before the submission of this manuscript to the editorial office and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the creation of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work.