Psychological Theories of Explanation of Corruption
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to explore the potential use of different psychological theories in explaining corrupt behavior in further use of the results obtained in the development of tactics and strategy of counteraction of corruption. Methodology is a set of scientific methods, namely: terminology, systematic and structural, formal-logical, comparative-legal. Theoretical grounds of research include the works of foreign scientists, which take up some of the theory and concepts of interpreting psychological foundations of corruption and measures to counter it. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the fact that it has systematized and analyzed the advantages, disadvantages and the capabilities of a single modern theories and concepts that explain corrupt behavior and formulated the need for the formation of a comprehensive theory able to cover the various determinants that cause this negative social phenomenon. According to the results of the conducted research, have been formulated the following conclusions: 1) the existence of the doctrine (theories, concepts) of the interpretation of the psychological bases of corruption behavior and measures to counter it (the theory of psychic dependence on undue benefit (bribery), the theory of convenience, symbolic interactionism, cognitive psychology, the theory of correlation of corruption, theory of the "principal-agent",“collective action” theory, institutional multiplicity theory, moral decay theory; 2) the disadvantages of modern approaches to explaining corruption through psychology (their one-sided nature: each researcher usually justifies one theory and denies the other or any other); 3) the need to combine elements of different doctrines that explain corruption behavior and to create a theory capable of explaining corruption most optimally and fully from psychological point of view.
Keywords: corruption; psychological theory; cognitive psychology; social psychology; psychological mechanism of corruption; bribery; symbolic interactionism; institutional multiplicity; counteracting corruption.
Downloads
Abstract views: 559 PDF Downloads: 519
- Authors reserve the right to authorship of their own work and transfer to the magazine the right of the first publication of this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows other persons to freely distribute published work with mandatory reference to authors of the original work and the first publication of an article in this magazine.
- Authors have the right to enter into separate additional agreements on non-exclusive dissemination of the work in the form in which it was published in the journal (for example, to post an article in the institution's repository or to publish as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
- The journal's policy allows and encourages the posting of articles by authors on the Internet (for example, in electronic storehouses of institutions or on personal websites), both before the submission of this manuscript to the editorial office and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the creation of a productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of citing the published work.
